You’re playing the Paganini Rhapsodyaround Australia. Does the work have special meaning for you?

I played it in teens first, very badly, in a half-learned sort of way with a youth orchestra somewhere in the Midlands. It was not a distinguished thing, so I put it aside. Not long after I’d won the Naumburg in 1985 I got a call from my manager who said, “Someone’s cancelled at the Hollywood Bowl in two days playing the Rachmaninov Rhapsody, can you go?” It was a great opportunity to play with the Los Angeles Phil, so I said “yes” and spent every hour I possibly could getting it into my fingers. It was a wonderful experience and it’s become part of my life since then.

So what appeals to you about the work?

It is a great piece – one of the most tightly constructed concertos in the repertoire. There isn’t an unnecessary bar in there, and it’s clever. Emotionally, it’s very satisfying, you feel a real journey from beginning to end. Musicologists and people who maybe don’t like Rachmaninov that much still find this piece impressive. Now I do like Rachmaninov, and I...

This article is available to Limelight subscribers.

Log in to continue reading.

Access our paywalled content and archive of magazines, regular news and features for the limited offer of $3 per month. Support independent journalism.

Subscribe now